Archive for January, 2009

The Tracey Fragments

I must admit I added this to the queue because I saw that Ellen Page was in it.  And by in it, I mean she was once again the leading lady.  The first time I experienced a Page film was with Hard Candy so I was more than eager to see Juno.  She’s quite the amazing actress for her age.  The Tracey Fragments reminded me a lot of Pieces of April.  Both films are about a young girl/woman trying to make it on their own.  They have not so desirable families and are trying to work things out in their lives.  This film was even visually fragmented on screen.  There were often multiple camera shots and angles, of the same scene, being shown all at once.  Some were from different perspectives, some from a different vantage point, others just sped up or down.  It was kind of interesting and kind of hard to take it all in at the same time.  Almost like being visually overstimulated.

The timeline was a bit hard to follow.  I think the multiple camera shots helped with my confusion.  I had never seen something like this persist throughout a whole movie.  This kind of seemed like a gutsy, young director thing to do.  I checked out who did the directing and saw that Bruce McDonald did have 35 other projects to his name before this one.  So he’s definitely not a rookie.  A pretty interesting style.  The saving grace was the ending though.  Eventually everything came together and made a lot more sense.  In the end you realize what was real, what was imagined, and how all the fragments fit together.

This is definitely a sad story.  Tracey’s 9 year old brother has disappeared and she’s trying to find him.  She also happens to be a very unpopular 15 year old in high school.  I’m sure many of us can relate to that…trying to find our way in the world.

I could see a lot of people not being into this movie.  If you start watching it, please stick through to the end.  You won’t be sorry.  It totally redeems itself.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

Grindhouse: Death Proof

This is the second installment I saw of Grindhouse and was directed by Quentin Tarantino.  See my review of Planet Terror if you need an intro to what the Grindhouse films are.

After seeing both of the Grindhouse films once, I’d have to say Death Proof was my favorite of the two.  Maybe it was just more of my style.  I’m not really into horror films anyways.  I’m also a huge fan of Tarantino and his films.  Just like some other heavily styled directors (Wes Anderson, the Coen Brothers, P.T. Anderson, Kevin Smith, Hitchcock, etc) you should be able to easily spot this as a Tarantino film if you’re familiar with his previous works.  It really seemed like Quentin was trying to create his own version of Smith’s Askewniverse.  Kevin Smith has his own little universe he has created amongst a series of movies in which characters, timelines, places, and situations float between the films.  Tarantino, and this might just be because of the order I saw them, reuses characters and places from Planet Terror.  He also reuses some actors/character from his previous films.  If you’ve seen Kill Bill, you’ll recognize the Texas sherrif and his son.

At first I thought this was a real ripoff and I complained to Liz about it.  When I had first heard about these two films being made, my understanding was they were going to make “crappy” movies nostalgic of their childhoods.  I felt like Rodriguez had stuck to the agreement and Tarantino cheated.  The quality of Death Proof just seemed much better than the first film I saw.  In reality, and I didn’t take the time to look anything up, I have no idea what the agreement was.  So that probably doesn’t matter, and, if Tarantino wants to reuse any of his stuff he has every right.

So Death Proof is about a movie stunt actor who has a “death proof” car.  It’s reinforced and has the fancy seat belts so he can do crazy things with his car and not be killed.  This “crazy” man with his crazy car also happens to be a bit of a serial killer.  He likes to stalk women, terrorize them on the road and kill them with his car.  We see Stuntman Mike, played by Kurt Russell, in two different situations terrorizing two different groups of women.  I won’t tell you what happens because that’s half the fun of watching.

I highly suggest watching Death Proof over Planet Terror if you need to pick between the two.  As usual there is some amazing music/soundtrack to go along with interesting scenes and scenarios.  Tarantino has a great knack for doing this.  I believe the radio station everyone is listening to is the same station from Resevoir Dogs.  I also love the fake trailer for Machete.  It stars Danny Trejo’s character from El Mariachi.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Grindhouse: Planet Terror

This is the first of the Grindhouse films I saw.  If you’re not familiar with what I’m talking about, directors Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino decided to make a couple of B-movie flicks.  The first that I saw, Planet Terror, was directed by Rodriguez and is about a biological outbreak of sorts.

I think the coolest thing about these films is the style.  It looks like something out of the 1970s - the scratchy film, the sound, the commercials, the trailers, etc.  I really wish the fake trailers would be made into real movies.  There are even random bits of the films missing due to a missing reel.  Before this whole digital age, films used to arrive in several reels that were loaded and lined up.  If you’ve seen Fight Club, Tyler Durden talks about the “cigarette mark, ” that little circle in the upper right corner, showing when a new reel has started.  This is something I had never even noticed until it was Tyler brought it to my attention.  Anyways, the style is really cool and the films are shot present day, just in this old style.

Planet Terror is about a military group, I assume rogue, has their hands on some biological weapon.  In a botched sale the chemical is released and starts wrecking havoc on the surronding area.  The only people immune are the soldiers who were trying to buy the weapon in the first place.  They have these gas masks of sorts on and are breathing in some type of antidote.

There is of course a group of heros who are trying to fight off the affected/infected people and these crazed soldiers at the same time.  Being true to the B-genre, there are some nifty little elements like Cherry, played by Rose McGowan, loses her leg and ends up with a stump.  A stump with a machine gun attached.  This proves quite useful later on.  While this film is a bit ridiculous, it’s definitely fun and entertaining.  Liz walked in and said, “gross.”  She happened to catch a couple scenes where the effects of the mysterious chemical was being seen on several townsfolk.

If you’ve seen a Rodriguez or Tarantino film before, you’ll probably recognize a lot of the actors.  This is definitely an ensemble cast effort.  If you get bored in the middle, just stick through to the end.  I’m sure you’ll enjoy it at least a little bit.

Rating: ★★★½☆

City of Men

City of Men is a sequel of sorts, based off a TV show, to City of God.  It takes place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and shows a peak into the lives of some young men living there.  The city is wrought with strife and gang wars.  This film illustrates some of the problems these children and young adults face just because of the color the their skin, where they live, who they’re related to, and what gang they belong to.  It also speaks a lot to fatherhood, or the lack thereof.

This story mainly consists of the relationship between two friends, Ace and Wallace.  They’re turning 18 and have come to the point in life where they’re finally grown up.  Ace already has a son and Wallace is in search of his biological father.  In the middle of everything, a gang war erupts putting these lifelong friends at odds.

I don’t feel like there’s much more I can say without giving away too much.  It’s a really great film and if you saw City of God, you need to see the follow up to the TV Series sequel.  I think there’s less violence in this film, but it’s just as powerful as the first.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Milk

Not having any idea who Harvey Milk was, other than what I had learned from the trailer, Milk was a very interesting look at the life of the first openly gay man to be elected to a major public office in the US.  Directed by Gus Van Sant, I knew this had to be at least a little good.  Then I noticed the amazing ensemble cast consisting of Sean Penn, Emile Hirsch, Josh Brolin, James Franco, Alison Pill, and Diego Luna.  Everyone did a great job.  I couldn’t really see a single character carrying the whole film with the exception of maybe Penn, but he was the central character.

Milk was a political activist in the 1970s who tried to rally the gay community on Castro street in San Francisco.  It was around this time that laws were being put into place giving employers, landlords, and communities the right to discriminate based on sexual preference.  This might sound a little crazy to you, but it was only about 50 years ago that the Civil Rights movement started in our nation.  I’ve heard some off-handed comments saying this movie is about “that gay guy.”  That’s only partially true.  I say this film is much more about civil rights than about gay rights.  Milk was someone who was able to rally people together of all races, religions and creeds.  This was even more evident after he was killed.

Don’t get mad cause I just gave the ending away.  This movie is about a real person, remember?  Penn was amazing.  I know there are a lot of you out there that just don’t like the guy, but he had an amazing performance in this one.  When people act, some mimic a person or character and others just melt into the person they are playing.  Sean Penn really melted into this one.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see him nominated for Best Actor on this one.

Also just saw Josh Brolin talking to James Lipton on The Actor’s Studio.  Brolin talked about auditioning for the part and working with Penn.  It was pretty interesting.  You should probably check it out if you get the chance.

Rating: ★★★★☆