Archive for the 'Thriller' Category

The Long Good Friday

Bob Hoskins is an actor I have noticed in recent films the past 10 years.  He’s obviously somebody that is respected in the acting world.  Today I think I found out why - The Long Good Friday.

If you’re a fan of Guy Ritchie and his cockney gangster films, you have to watch this.  In this Hoskins plays a big-time gangster who is trying to capitalize on some prime real estate, but everything seems to be going wrong.  His friends and family are being targeted along with his businesses.  This is not looking good to the investors and the American mobsters are re-thinking their investment options.

I knew the film had to be good from the start because it had a catchy tune.  Movies these days seem to lack the kind of openings like this.  Then I realized both P.H. Moriarty (Hatchet Harry fromLock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels) and Alan Ford (Brick Top from Snatch and Alan/Narrator from Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels) were in it.  Pretty soon I also started noticing phrases like, “This is like a bad night in Vietnam.” being very similar to “A minute ago this was the safest job in the world. Now it’s turning into a bad day in Bosnia.”  The similarities continue.  I would even suppose that both Moriarty and Ford took some inspiration for their parts in Ritchie’s films from Bob Hoskin’s portrayal of a gangster.

Seeing how great Guy Ritchie apparently thought of John Mackenzie, I’m now interested in seeing what else Mackenzie has directed.  Oh, and did I mention this is in the Criterion Collection? If you’re a fan of British film, you’re sure to recognize many actors from back in the day. Definitely worth renting!

Rating: ★★★★☆

Dollhouse

I think this is the first time I’ve ever talked about a TV show on here.  We’ve tried to stick to movies.  Tonight I saw the first episode of Joss Whedon’s new TV series on Fox called Dollhouse.  This show is about a group of five men and women who are essentially blank slates.  They have personalities downloaded into them and are then contracted out to perform jobs.  It’s kind of like the ultimate temp agency mixed with some Matrix-style brain downloading.

Starring in this show is Eliza Dushku, playing the character of Echo.  We get to see her in action during the first episode, but not everything works out as planned.  We know there are four others working for this agency, but we haven’t been introduced to them yet. You’ll probably also recognize Tahmoh Penikett who played Helo on Battlestar Galactica and Olivia Williams who played Rosemary Cross, the teacher, on Rushmore.

If you’re not familiar with Joss Whedon, he’s the creator of shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel and Firefly.  He’s well known for his science fiction and being a feminist.  I’m not talking about Rosie the Riveter here, I’m talking about a guy who respects women, writes great roles for them in his projects, and doesn’t treat them like eye candy.  This reputation of his has come under fire with this new project because it kind of fulfills one of those “ultimate male fantasies.”  You have women seen as things and not people.  While I have to agree with that at face value, I’m not ready to make a judgment yet.  I was definitely intrigued by this first episode and am planning on tuning in next week.

For more information visit Fox’s website (http://www.fox.com/dollhouse/) or Dollverse (http://www.dollverse.com/).

Rating: ★★★½☆

Grindhouse: Planet Terror

This is the first of the Grindhouse films I saw.  If you’re not familiar with what I’m talking about, directors Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino decided to make a couple of B-movie flicks.  The first that I saw, Planet Terror, was directed by Rodriguez and is about a biological outbreak of sorts.

I think the coolest thing about these films is the style.  It looks like something out of the 1970s - the scratchy film, the sound, the commercials, the trailers, etc.  I really wish the fake trailers would be made into real movies.  There are even random bits of the films missing due to a missing reel.  Before this whole digital age, films used to arrive in several reels that were loaded and lined up.  If you’ve seen Fight Club, Tyler Durden talks about the “cigarette mark, ” that little circle in the upper right corner, showing when a new reel has started.  This is something I had never even noticed until it was Tyler brought it to my attention.  Anyways, the style is really cool and the films are shot present day, just in this old style.

Planet Terror is about a military group, I assume rogue, has their hands on some biological weapon.  In a botched sale the chemical is released and starts wrecking havoc on the surronding area.  The only people immune are the soldiers who were trying to buy the weapon in the first place.  They have these gas masks of sorts on and are breathing in some type of antidote.

There is of course a group of heros who are trying to fight off the affected/infected people and these crazed soldiers at the same time.  Being true to the B-genre, there are some nifty little elements like Cherry, played by Rose McGowan, loses her leg and ends up with a stump.  A stump with a machine gun attached.  This proves quite useful later on.  While this film is a bit ridiculous, it’s definitely fun and entertaining.  Liz walked in and said, “gross.”  She happened to catch a couple scenes where the effects of the mysterious chemical was being seen on several townsfolk.

If you’ve seen a Rodriguez or Tarantino film before, you’ll probably recognize a lot of the actors.  This is definitely an ensemble cast effort.  If you get bored in the middle, just stick through to the end.  I’m sure you’ll enjoy it at least a little bit.

Rating: ★★★½☆

Rambo

Before I even start, I must admit that I had been avoiding the 4th Rambo installment for a while.  It just seemed a little ridiculous to me that Sylvester Stallone would be doing another Rambo and another Rocky movie.  It was only after several friends tried to assure me it was good, that I decided to add it to my Netflix list.  Now, after seeing it, I must admit that Rambo totally redeemed Rambo III.

I think one of the big factors contributing to the worth of this film was Stallone stepping in as a writer, and directing the film.  He’s obviously had a lot of experience acting, writing, and directing and was aware “the people” would not abide more of the same considering what happened with Rambo III.  Another contributing factor was Stallone trying to shed some light on the atrocities currently happening in Burma.

Action.  If there’s one thing this movie has, it’s action.  I’m pretty sure Robin would say something along the lines of, “Holy belt-fed machine guns, Batman!”  Liz walked in and saw a short clip during one of the featurettes on the DVD and uttered, “gross!”  I must say I wasn’t grossed out, I actually thought it was kind of cool.  That must be the little boy in me.

The story was pretty general.  Rambo helps some people, against his initial instinct, and eventually ends up saving them.  I really appreciated the “wandering warrior” theme that has prevailed throughout the series.  Parts of the original score were also worked into this score which reall tied the films together.  The execution of the story is really what made it work for me though.  Stallone really pulled off the Rambo character as an older version, still searching for meaning in his life and slightly enraged at the atrocities around him.

If you’re even a tiny bit a fan of First Blood, I highly suggest you check this one out.  It’ll be well worth your time.  I only hope Rambo V builds off of the success of Rambo.

Rating: ★★★★☆

The Dark Knight

Liz and I were able to catch the latest installment in the Batman series over the weekend.  We’re both glad we were able to catch it on the big screen.  After all the buildup, hype, and raving reviews, we finally got to see what everyone was talking about.


I was very impressed with Batman Begins and I wasn’t in any way disappointed with The Dark Knight.  I’m already looking forward to the next one.  Heath Ledger did an amazing job with The Joker.  I was reading someone’s comments somewhere and they were talking about how they’ve never been a Ledger fan until now.  They also never realized how menacing and diabolical the Joker could actually be, and after thinking about Jack Nicholson’s portrayal from 1989, they realized that Nicholson was just delivering the same role he had been for the previous 20 years or so.  You may or may not agree with that, but it was a little mind blowing to me.  Maybe I haven’t seen enough of Nicholson’s films, but I’ve never quite understood why people are so enamored by him.  Yeah, he has some good films out there with great performances, but I’ve never been that impressed.  It’s really too bad Ledger isn’t with us anymore for any follow-up films.

Often times in sequels, it’s hard to make something that lives up to the original.  I think Christopher Nolan did a good job in raising the bar by bringing in the Joker, but there’s always room for some improvements.  I don’t think Christian Bale had to really act that much this time around.  The gutteral “batman voice” got a little annoying and old, but it makes sense he was talking differently to try and hide his identity.  Aaron Eckhart did a decent job.  I’ll always remember him as Nick Naylor from Thank You for Smoking.  It’ll be interesting to see if he makes a comeback in the future.

I think Gary Oldman had a much more active role this time around.  He’s such a great actor and it’s nice to see him able to spread his wings a bit.  I liked Maggie Gyllenhaal more than Katie Holmes in the role of Rachel Dawes.  She also fit in pretty well.  It wasn’t like some films where actors change for a particular character and the whole time you’re confused as to who exactly that person is.  Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman were wonderful as usual.  Some friends of mine complained after the first film that they were grossly underutilized.  I kind of agreed, however, it was nice to actually have a “real” actor play the role of Alfred for a change.  I was just happy to have a live body in the role.

Some of the scenes with the Joker are a bit disturbing, but this is rated PG-13, so there’s not a whole lot to worry about.  They cut away at just the right moments in certain scenes.  Liz and I both said we got a little bored in the middle, but overall we thoroughly enjoyed it.  I would highly suggest getting out and seeing this one before it leaves the theaters.  You won’t be sorry.

Rating: ★★★★½

11:14

The title 11:14 refers to a time.  On one fateful night, a lot of lives are drastically changed at exactly 11:14.  People die, people are hit by cars, a convenient store is robbed, one girl is playing several people for money, and one guy even losing some very important bits in a bit of a car accident.

I wish I had heard of this one when it came out.  I was really impressed with it.  Some of the cast includes Hilary Swank, Colin Hanks, Rachael Leigh Cook, Jason Segel, Patrick Swayze, and Ben Foster.  I’m not completely sure if this would be considered a neo-noir or not, but it definitely has a lot of those elements in it.  This is another one of those films with multiple time lines and everyone being connected in the end.  It might be good to watch this one without the movie talkers and question-askers.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Happy Endings

I didn’t really know what to think of the cover, but the plot looked good so I decided to check this out.  Happy Endings is a story about several groups of people all being connected without knowing it.  Kind of like Pulp Fiction.

Mamie, Lisa Kudrow, is a middle aged woman working as a counselor and dating Javier, Bobby Cannavale.  She’s being blackmailed by Nicky, Jesse Bradford - the kid from Hackers, to help him make a movie about her life and her child she has never met.  Meanwhile, Otis, Jason Ritter, has a band and just hired on Jude, Maggie Gyllenhaal, to be their new vocals.  Things get weird though when Otis’ father, Tom Arnold, takes an interest in Otis’ new girlfriend, Jude.  There are a few more characters I’m not going to go into, but I’m not going to spell it all out for you.

One thing I took from this movie was how incredibly messed up some of the characters are.  Mamie is being blackmailed over her son she gave away years ago by a somewhat crazy kid.  All kinds of interesting things happen there.  Otis is also going through hell watching his father being used by his ex-girlfriend while dealing with his own insecurities and issues.  Like I said earlier, everything ends up being connected in the end.

I wasn’t really sure where this movie was going, but ending up really liking it by the end.  There were a lot of strong performances by many of the characters and actors.  I’d recommend checking this one out.

Rating: ★★★★☆

In the Valley of Elah

I’ve been finding it intersting that more and more movies are coming out about the war in Iraq.  The other day it just dawned on me that in 20 years, this war will be just like Vietnam in that there will be plenty of books, movies, etc out there for people to learn from.

In the same way that Lions for Lambs seemed so lame compared to Charlie Wilson’s War, I think Robert Redford’s film once again pales in comparison to In the Valley of Elah.  The first pair goes together because they both deal with war in Afghanistan.  The second pair also makes sense because they both deal with the current “War on Terror” or “War of Terror” as Borat puts it.

This film deals with a soldier that has just returned from home, but turns up missing.  Tommy Lee Jones, plays the boy’s father, is trying to figure out what happened to his son.  Being a veteran, and a bit of an investigator himself, Hank Deerfield isn’t satisfied with the lackluster efforts and figuring out just what happened to his son.  Through trial and tribulation, Hank finally gets Detective Sanders, Charlize Theron, to take a real look at the case and try to piece all the parts together.  In the meantime, Hank is trying to make sense of some of the videos his son had been sending home to him from the battlefield.

This is truly a sad and tragic story, but I feel that it gave me a little peak into what some of these people are going through.  Every once in a while I catch a blip on the news about what’s going on in that region of the world.  The only real thing that’s actually affecting me are gas prices and the economy tanking.  I’m not in the armed forces though, and there’s very little chance of a draft happening again so I’d be really surprised if I ever experienced anything like this first hand.

Rating: ★★★★☆

The Host

I can’t say I’ve seen too many Korean films, but this one is top-notch in my book. When I saw the previews for this a couple years ago I was looking forward to seeing it. I don’t think it ever came my way though. In classic Japanese-Godzilla-style, a strange mutated fish thing is created in a river due to toxic waste being poured down the drain. Eventually this creature gets big enough to start terrorizing the local population and eating people.

The film centers around the Park family. The grandfather runs a food stand in a park next to the river. Mr. Park is helped by one son, his daughter is an Olympic archer, and his other son is a bit of a drunk. His granddaughter is currently in the 7th grade and is one of the many victims on the day of the attack. That fateful day, and the death of the granddaughter, brings the whole family back together as they try to deal with the tragedy.

While The Host is definitely science fiction and suspenseful, there’s also some witty humor thrown into the mix amongst some of the more tense scenes. I found it quite hilarious when these sarcastic remarks were thrown in during the scenes when you shouldn’t be laughing.

I would highly suggest this for anyone who even thought of maybe seeing it. While this movie is about a monster, it’s not a scary horror movie that will leave you jumping out of your seats. It’s also not cheesy and boring like many of these can be.

Rating: ★★★★½

The Happening

From my perspective, no other current Hollywood persona is as intriguing as M. Night Shyamalan. Did he really just get that lucky with The Sixth Sense? I believe it is that amazing breakthrough film from this writer/director with a knack for suspense and surprise endings that has kept audiences coming back time and time again. Despite some decent follow-ups, never has he repeated the excellence of his first film, and many would agree that his films have been getting progressively worse.

And so, we complain and complain about his movies, but still somehow get excited about showing up for opening night every two years for his latest offering, perhaps hoping that maybe this will be the one to capture the same feeling as The Sixth Sense. This is enough to say that Shyamalan is doing something right. Despite the things he’s doing wrong–and lately, there’s quite a bit–he still keeps us coming back for more. Few people have given up on him yet.

That brings us to The Happening, a film proudly advertised as “apocalyptic” and Shyamalan’s first rated-R feature, featuring some bizarre epidemic–supposedly caused by plants attacking large populations of humans–that forces people to kill themselves in increasingly creative ways. Mark Wahlberg, seemingly advertised as some sort of hero, is rather just one of many ordinary people trying to avoid the attack.

(Here’s one more thing often complained about–What’s with the deceiving advertising with this guy’s films? Everybody was stunned to find out what The Village really was about. And The Happening had nothing to do with the rapture like I was told.)

The bad news first. Simply put, the movie indeed causes you to constantly ask, “What’s happening?” But not in a whodunit sort of way, and not in an edge-of-your-seat-what’s-going-to-happen-next sort of way. No, instead you find yourself asking, “Is this serious? Did that really just happen? Did he really just say that? Did she really just deliver her line in that way? Is it possible to make a movie this preposterous?” My wife and I spent the entire movie hoping–for Shyamalan’s sake and for the sake of our $18 admission–that the surprise ending would reveal that the whole movie was a joke, a sort of film inside of a film, a spoof of sorts. We weren’t that lucky, and neither was Shyamalan. It was just that bad.

The dialog is absolutely terrible. The acting is pathetic. The cinematography is cliche. The gore is tactless and hokey. The entire film comes off as incredibly cheesy schlock. By the end of it I was hoping this was Shyamalan’s tribute to the campy B-side horror genre. I still think that’s the strongest explanation, although I’ve found nothing on the web to back that up, and even so, I’ve never quite been sure how we could make a “legitimate” art form by making something that is simply and intentionally bad.

It takes some serious misguidance to turn an Oscar-winning actor into the character we see in The Happening. Literally every line causes the viewer to wince with discomfort. Is it Wahlberg? Or is it just that there was literally no good way to deliver the lines that had been written for him? When Be Kind Rewind came out earlier this year, I heard many people suggest that Michel Gondry get some help writing his scripts. I’ll agree that they need help, but I also think Gondry has different intentions with his films than creating a stellar, flawless screenplay. We need to get Shyamalan some help with script writing much sooner than Gondry.

I ended up giggling through most of the movie, and not because it was supposed to be funny. Again, if it was Shyamalan’s intent to create a campy B-side flick, then so be it, he succeeded. But regardless of his intent, it was bad. Really bad.

There’s a bit of good news, though. Shyamalan is a master of suspense, and there’s no doubt about that. I jumped out of my seat more than once, and when I arrived home to my dark apartment, a shiver went down my spine and I rushed to turn on the lights. If you’re looking for a good scare, this is a decent place to turn.

And I have to say I enjoyed myself. Between giggling at the bad parts and jumping at the scary parts, it was a good bit of summer Blockbuster fun.

But most importantly, I admire that Shyamalan consistently tries to say something with his movies, another facet making him one of the more intriguing filmmakers today. While most critics are looking at the environmental themes of The Happening–save the honeybees and the trees before it’s too late–I think Shyamalan has some much deeper statements to make. Love conquering evil is an obvious theme, but perhaps too obvious. The most poignant statement is his dark caricature of Christians. The last woman left to help Wahlberg and his friends is a woman living in isolation who recites the twenty-third Psalm, has all sorts of religious paraphernalia on her walls, and wears a cross necklace. When she claims that “the world doesn’t care about her, so she doesn’t care about it,” it forces the Christian viewer to think long and hard. How much of this caricature is Shyamalan’s bitter misperception and how much of it is deservedly true?

So in short, it was a terrible movie. But if a director can cause people to think and talk this much time and time again, and keep us repeatedly coming back for more, maybe he is doing something right.

Rating: ★★☆☆☆